A lot comes together.
This coming-together is called synthesis.
The word synthesis has now become universal.
It is applied in various fields, including Chemistry, manufacturing and the like.
It is also applied in areas where deep thought boils down facts to unity, to arrive at a conclusion.
What all are we looking at, with stocks?
One can list other stuff, but this list should do too.
One needs to synthesize the ingredients in such a manner, that the resultant matches one’s risk-profile. [[Why? Matching means successful market-play. Try it out.]]
That, my dear friends, is the art of synthesis, in a nutshell.
Prediction is not pivotal here.
We’re getting psychology and strategy right.
We want winning marketplay, right?
Prediction is for losing marketplay. Prediction might be wrong. That’s when strategy and psychology save you from big loss. A big loss can wipe you out. Thus, dependence upon sheer prediction brings a wipe-out into play. That’s why, prediction is almost always relegated to the bottom rank when one talks about winning marketplay.
We’ll travel with a hint of prediction, though. Just a hint. Doesn’t suffice for losing yet.
For entry purposes. Only.
Even this hint of prediction is bias-giving, though. Once we enter, we need to quickly lose the bias. Yeah, once we enter, we only react to what we see.
Our system has an edge. It helps us choose market direction. After that, psychology and strategy take over.
Meaning, after we’ve entered, there’s no more prediction in play.
So what’s in play then?
The raw trade.
At this point, all your mental strength comes into play.
Oh, and your strategy.
You do have a strategy, right?
As in, if x happens, they y, and if a happens then b.
You need a stoploss too.
You don’t have to show it. It can be mental, provided you don’t fool yourself into not using it when the time comes.
You won’t execute your stop.
Again and again.
Till you teach yourself how to.
Till you lose big. And are still left standing. To want to enter again.
Learning to take a small hit, again and again and again – that’s winning marketplay. Requires huge psychological strength. You acquire this. You don’t have to be born with it.
Now comes another punchline.
That profit-sapling just emerging…see it? You will not nip it in the bud.
You’ll still do it.
You’ll nip it in the bud.
Again and again.
Till you teach yourself not to.
It’s not easy.
95%+ of all market players continue to nip profits in the bud all their lives.
To allow the sapling to grow into a tree is the most difficult of all market lessons. Learning to let profits run is winning market play.
To want more profits, you have to risk some of your current profits.
No more risk, no more gain.
You want to quickly exit and post that 22% gain on your Excel sheet. Sure. Why can’t you let it grow into an 82% gain? God alone knows. That’s how the cookie crumbles. You nip the opportunity to make that 82%.
What’s with 82?
Just a random number.
Am trying to get a point across. There’s a run happening. In a direction. It’s crossing +22%. Fast. Momentum could see it to +102%, to then backtrack and settle at +82%. It’s a probable scenario.
Anyways, there are some smarties that risk 12 of the 22% and stay in the trade. Soon the 22 can even go beyond 82. Lets say it does. What do you do?
You let it travel. Momentum is to be allowed free leeway, till it halts. Let’s say it halts at 102. You say to yourself that the winds might change if 102 goes back to 82, and tell your broker to exit if 82 is hit intraday.
That and that alone is the proper way to exit a winning trade. You exit it with the taste of loss. You let the market throw you out. For all you know, the market might be in the mood for 152. You want to give the trade that chance. Thus, a momentum target exit while the move is still on would be less lucrative for you in the long run, or so I think.
Statistics are defined by big wins. These matter. Big-time. Allow them to happen. Again and again and again.
Now add position-sizing into your strategy. The ideology of position-sizing has been discovered and fantastically developed by Dr. Van Tharp.
In a nutshell, position-sizing means that an increasing trading corpus due to winning should result in an increasing level risked. Also, correspondingly, a decreasing trading corpus due to losing should result in a decreasing level risked.
With position-sizing added to your arsenal, no one will be able to hinder your progress.
Psychological strength that comes from experiencing first-hand and digesting learning from varied market scenarios, coupled with a stoploss/profitrun position-sizing strategy – that’s a winning combination.
Wishing you happy and lucrative trading!
Yeah, it’s always lurking…
… in the background…
…waiting for an opportunity…
… to catch you unawares…
… and spring to the forefront.
Market-play is a mental battle.
Your mind wins or loses it for you.
Make your mind understand the value…
… of action…
… and of inaction.
Make your mind pinpoitedly choose…
… the time for action…
… and for inaction.
Make your mind automatically switch from…
… a state of action…
… to a state of inaction…
… and vice-versa…
… and feel perfectly normal doing the switch…
… again and again and again.
The above by itself is a winning state of mind for you, which you can build upon.
Makes you sleep easy.
Simultaneously, you are able to take a calculated risk.
Why should you take a risk?
No risk no gain.
It’s as simple as that.
You have to put something on the line to possibly gain something.
That’s what market activity is all about.
You’re doing this all the time.
Day in, day out.
You’ve become used to a steady and dynamic LINE. Your line doesn’t harm you anymore. It doesn’t disrupt your life.
How did you achieve this?
By using stops and hedges.
What’s the difference?
The difference is technical, and then practical.
For some mindsets and positions, a stop is more suited.
When you don’t mind exposing your market-play, and want to close your terminal and do other stuff, use a stop.
You get up from your desk, engage in other activity, and have forgotten about your position, because now you don’t need to tend to its needs for 24 hours, for example.
Your position will either play out, or it won’t.
If it doesn’t, your stop will automatically throw you out of your position.
The level of the stop is digestible.
Next morning, you simply move on to a new trade.
Let’s say you don’t want to to expose your market play, or, in some cases, when you don’t need to expose your market play – how do you then insure yourself?
A hedge maintains general market neutrality.
It leaves windows open for what-if scenarios.
For example, the trade could make money, and then the hedge could make money.
Or, vice-versa. As in lose-lose. Sure, there are win-loss and loss-win scenarios too.
The starting point is somewhat neutral, and then there are permutations and combinations.
Some people prefer this kind of play.
They like the possibility of maximizing profit from the total position at a calculated higher risk.
Generally, the idea is for your main position to make money and your hedge to lose money.
It might or might not play out like that.
Some like this uncertainty and know how to benefit from it.
A stop is sure-shot and straight-forward. It is low-risk as long as it is digestible.
Hedges open you to the risks of a meta-game. Play becomes more interesting, consuming, and possibly, more profitable, for experienced hedgers.
In my opinion, a hedge is slightly higher in risk than a stop.
However, both entities lower overall risk.
Currency pair forex trades are typically taken with a stop. However, they can be hedged too.
Market-neutral option-trades are typically taken using hedges.
Step into a trade with either or, for peace of mind and career longevity.